Legal Opinion

McKee v. Hubert

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1955No. 18822PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

Generally, the owner of land in fee has the right to use his land for any lawful purpose. Kitchens v. Noland, 172 Ga. 684 (158 S. E. 562); England v. Atkinson, 196 Ga. 181 (26 S. E. 2d 431); Spencer v. Poole, 207 Ga. 155 (60 S. E. 2d 371). Restrictions upon the use of property not appearing in the chain of title, but alleged to exist by implication, can only be established by evidence that is clear and beyond a reasonable doubt. England v. Atkinson, supra; Shemwell v. McIntosh, 204 Ga. 894 (52 S. E. 2d 464); Lawson v. Lewis, 205 Ga. 227 (52 S. E. 2d 859).

The undisputed evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. AkridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Kitchens v. NolandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Spencer v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. England v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Lawson v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Birdsey v. Wesleyan CollegeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  2. Roth v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Springmont Homeowners Ass'n v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API