Legal Opinion
Pinchbeck v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 30, 2000No. AC 18852PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The plaintiff, Kristine Pinchbeck, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her appeal from the February 25, 1998 decision of the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of Guil-ford (board).2 The plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the motion to dismiss filed by the defendants Gary Friedlaender and Linda Friedlaender, which alleged that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary for a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Johnson v. Department of Public HealthConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Bosley v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Munroe v. Zoning Board of Appeals of BranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Holt v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Borden v. North Stonington, No. 558530s (Apr. 25, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Pinchbeck v. Guilford Zba, No. Cv 98-0412007 S (Feb. 25, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002