Legal Opinion

Witt v. McKenna

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 9, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

Plaintiff Bruce A. Witt appeals from a judgment entered after a non-jury trial in the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Browne, A.R.J.) in favor of defendants John W. and Elizabeth D. McKenna. Witt contends that the court erred in finding that a right-of-way running across the defendants’ property had been abandoned by plaintiff’s predecessors-in-title. Because the court’s finding of abandonment is not supported by the necessary clear and convincing evidence, we vacate the judgment.

I

In 1907 and again in 1910, Witt’s predecessor purchased a right-of-way from Martha M. Strout…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. HodgkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
  2. Wildes v. Ocean National Bank of KennebunkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Chase v. EastmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Fitzpatrick v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Mueller v. BohannonNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Phillips v. GreggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. Canadian National Railway v. SpragueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API