Bell v. Neman Marcus, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SATZ, Presiding Judge.
This is a workers’ compensation case. Claimant, Helen Bell, was awarded compensation by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). Subsequently, she filed an application for rehearing on the grounds of change in condition. § 287.470 RSMo. 1986. The Commission denied her application. The circuit court affirmed. Claimant appeals. We affirm.
Defendants Neiman Marcus, Inc., employer, and Maryland Casualty Company, insurer, raise a threshold procedural matter. They argue the Commission’s denial of claimant’s application is not a final and appealable order.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Strohmeyer v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Swillum v. Empire Gas Transport, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Barr v. Vickers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hawkins v. Emerson Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003