Legal Opinion

Bell v. Neman Marcus, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1987No. 51592PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Presiding Judge.

This is a workers’ compensation case. Claimant, Helen Bell, was awarded compensation by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). Subsequently, she filed an application for rehearing on the grounds of change in condition. § 287.470 RSMo. 1986. The Commission denied her application. The circuit court affirmed. Claimant appeals. We affirm.

Defendants Neiman Marcus, Inc., employer, and Maryland Casualty Company, insurer, raise a threshold procedural matter. They argue the Commission’s denial of claimant’s application is not a final and appealable order.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Strohmeyer v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Swillum v. Empire Gas Transport, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Barr v. Vickers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Hawkins v. Emerson Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API