Resper v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
The issue in this appeal is the propriety of the sentence imposed upon Appellant by the sentence review panel which reviewed Appellant’s sentence pursuant to Maryland Code (1957, 1996 Repl.Vol.) Article 27, §§ 645JA-645JG. 1 The primary question we must answer is whether a three-judge sentence review panel has the authority to review a recommendation for Patuxent Institution. We conclude that it does, and accordingly we shall affirm.
I
On March 27,1998, appellant, Wayne Resper, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County after he pled guilty to attempted first degree…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Total Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- State v. BrantnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Ridgeway v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.