Deakyne v. Commissioners of Lewes
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATCHUM*, District Judge.
This case is presently before the Court on the plaintiff’s motion to strike three affirmative defenses asserted in the defendants’ amended answer. The relevant background may be summarized as follows:
The plaintiff, Ethel C. Deakyne (“Mrs. Deakyne”), is the record title owner in fee simple of a certain tract of land in the Town of Lewes, Sussex County, Delaware, generally located on the northeast side of the Lewes and Rehoboth Canal and on the north side of Market Street (“the Deakyne tract”). The Deakyne tract originally included the bed of a roadway, known as…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Monacelli v. GrimesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scureman v. JudgeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
- Deakyne v. Commissioners of LewesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
- Department of Transportation v. J&J Properties of Langhorne, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
- Shotwell v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Shotwell v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978