Atkinson v. Long
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This case comes to us on an appeal from a summary judgment entered by the trial court. Consequently, we must determine the appropriateness of that order under the "substantial evidence" rule. § 12-21-12, Code 1975 (1987 Cum.Supp.).
Pursuant to 1987 Ala. Acts 184, now § 12-21-12, the scintilla rule was abolished and replaced on June 11, 1987, by the "substantial evidence" rule. This case, having been filed after the effective date of the new act, is governed by the new rule.
We note that this change did not alter the procedure concerning the burden of proof on a motion for summary judgment. It…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Harrell v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Shelby County Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Motes v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Porter v. FisherCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Ex Parte Waterjet Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Goree v. ShirleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Ennis v. KittleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Horn v. City of BirminghamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.