Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mark W. Morgan, an Infant, by Herbert N. Morgan, His Father and Next Friend v. James e.garris and Newcomb-Jones Realty, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 31, 1962No. 16247_1Published

1ConcurrenceFahy, Circuit Judge

I agree entirely with the opinion written by Judge Edgerton for a majority of the court. The dissenting opinion prompts this brief additional concurrence.

Section 2508 of the Housing Regulations is by no means in terms limited to “Interior stairs,” and we should not decide now, as our dissenting brethren would do, that it has no bearing on this case. Appellant had no trial, and the Regulation was not considered by the trial court. See Hecht Co. v. McLaughlin, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 382, 385, 214 F.2d 212, 215, where we said:

“for us to rule on the present record whether or not the regulation applied *…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Marguerite Jamieson v. Woodward & LothropCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  2. Audrey Whetzel, Frederick Whetzel, Jr., and Frederick Whetzel v. Jess Fisher Management Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. Bowles v. Mahoney. District of Columbia v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. Mary Osin v. Robert H. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Hecht Co. v. McLaughlin Hecht C. v. Ellison Bronze Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API