Legal Opinion
Person v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 3, 1958No. 37,182Published
1Opinion of the Court
252 Minn. 110 (1958)
89 N.W. (2d) 694
MARY PERSON
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY.
No. 37,182.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
April 3, 1958.
Bowen & Bowen and Robert E. Bowen, for appellant.
Meagher, Geer, Markham & Anderson, David W. Nord, O.C. Adamson II, and Mary Jeanne Coyne, for respondent.
FRANK T. GALLAGHER, JUSTICE.
Appeal from an order denying the motion of defendant, Sears, Roebuck and Company, for a new trial.
Plaintiff, in her complaint, alleged that on January 16, 1954, she was in defendant's store for the purpose of transacting business; that an agent and employee of defendant so carelessly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Rodgers v. BoyntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Dahlberg v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.