Schoeller v. Board of County Commissioners

I dissent.

The plaintiff county, in my opinion, had authority under its general powers1 to pass *880a resolution holding development in status quo as nearly as practicable while the formal comprehensive plan contemplated by § 18-289.3, W.S.1957, Cum.Supp.,2 was being formulated and it was not necessary to conform to the notice requirements of § 18-289.4, W.S.1957, Cum.Supp. Since the county was operating within an authorized power, it has implied and inherent power to do those things both necessary and proper to directly effect the functions by the legislature created. Nation v. State ex rel. Fire…