Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Minerva Automobiles, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 24, 1934No. Gen. No. 37,743PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Complainant, having elected to rescind the sale for breach of warranty, filed a bill in equity to recover the consideration paid by him on account of the purchase price of a Minerva automobile and to foreclose his lien for the amount paid on the contract. Defendant Minerva Automobiles, Inc., filed a demurrer, which was overruled, and defendant answered; the matter was referred to a master in chancery who took evidence and made a report; an amendment was made to the bill and defendant again demurred, which was overruled; defendant stood on its demurrer and a decree was entered granting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knapp, Stout & Co. v. McCaffreySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Knapp, Stout & Co. Co. v. McCaffreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. West Chicago Park Commissioners v. Western Granite Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Brandenburg v. Buda Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McNab v. HealdIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Minerva Sales Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  2. Penn Securities Co. v. Sacco, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API