Krueger v. Tran
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Hau Tran appeals from a district court order granting Shannon Krueger’s motion to modify primary residential responsibility of their child. We affirm, concluding the court’s decision to modify primary residential responsibility is not clearly erroneous.
I
[¶ 2] Tran and Krueger have one minor child together, who was born in 2001. Both parties allege the other abused drugs in the past. Both parties have drug convictions, and Krueger was incarcerated twice.
[¶ 3] In 2005, the district court entered a judgment giving Krueger physical custody of the child based on the parties’…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Selzler v. SelzlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Loll v. LollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Slappy v. SlappyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Rustad v. RustadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Regan v. LervoldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Valeu v. StrubeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.