Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Tran

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2012No. 20120152PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Hau Tran appeals from a district court order granting Shannon Krueger’s motion to modify primary residential responsibility of their child. We affirm, concluding the court’s decision to modify primary residential responsibility is not clearly erroneous.

I

[¶ 2] Tran and Krueger have one minor child together, who was born in 2001. Both parties allege the other abused drugs in the past. Both parties have drug convictions, and Krueger was incarcerated twice.

[¶ 3] In 2005, the district court entered a judgment giving Krueger physical custody of the child based on the parties’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Selzler v. SelzlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Loll v. LollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Slappy v. SlappyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Rustad v. RustadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Regan v. LervoldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Valeu v. StrubeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API