Legal Opinion

Hitchcock Military Academy v. Myers

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1926No. Docket No. 3008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Action by plaintiff to recover of the defendant $900 alleged to be due on account of certain contracts for tuition, entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant. Respondent had judgment for $896.91 and from this judgment the defendant appeals. It appears from the transcript that the defendant is the mother of two minor sons, Paul de Back Myers and Theodore E. Myers; that on or about the first day of June, 1924, at San Rafael, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a contract in writing for the admission of the two minor sons of the defendant into the school conducted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Vidor v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Teeter v. Horner Military SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oakland California Towel Co. v. SivilsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Stewart v. ClaudiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Bergman v. BoulignyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Wentworth Military Academy v. MarshallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Amis v. Air Conditioning Training Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API