Legal Opinion

Vidor v. Peacock

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1912PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Bexar County Court; Geo. W. Huntress, Judge. Action by Wesley Peacock against C. S. Vidor. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, C. J.

The action is upon two notes executed by appellant to appellee.

Defendant answered by demurrers, no question being made here thereon, and by general denial, and by special answer substantially as follows: That defendant, Vidor, desiring to enter his son into plaintiff’s military school at San Antonio, entered into a special agreement with plaintiff, whereby the latter was to admit the son as a student for the scholastic year beginning September, 1908, and ending May, 1909. In consideration therefor, defendant paid plaintiff $200 in cash, and executed the notes sued on, which were for $100…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garrison v. CookeTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Horner School v. . WescottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Villarreal v. Art Institute of Houston, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  2. Eiland v. Wolf, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  3. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston v. Babb, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
  4. GC Murphy Company v. LackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Bergman v. BoulignyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API