Legal Opinion

Watson v. Salzman

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtDavid K. Glickman, J.

In this action to recover for personal injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendants, a defense has been interposed asserting that the injury was sustained while plaintiff was engaged in his employment with the defendant, Salzman, thus barring him from seeking recovery by way of this plenary suit. The issue raised by such defense has been tried separately before the court without a jury, pursuant to order dated April 10, 1963. Upon all the proof presented, the court finds and decides as follows:

Defendant, Salzman, who was engaged in the floor waxing business, hired…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claim of Littler v. George A. Fuller Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Green v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Van Gee v. KortsNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Miano v. SchneiderNew York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API