Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Ogland

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to discharge an attachment. The grounds specified in the affidavit for attachment are:

“That the defendant has removed or is about to remove his property, or a material part thereof, from this state, not leaving enough therein for the payment of his debts. Has sold, assigned, transferred, secreted or otherwise disposed of, or is about to sell, assign, transfer, secrete, or otherwise dispose of, his property with intent to cheat or defraud his creditors, or to hinder or delay them in the collection of their debts; is about to remove his property,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weil v. QuamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Page v. SteinkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Baird v. IrvineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API