Legal Opinion

Baird v. Irvine

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1931No. File No. 5932Published

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

This appeal is from an order of the district court of Emmons County denying defendant’s motion to discharge an attachment.

The plaintiff sued the defendant on a promissory note for $800, dated January 3, 1930, and due on demand. This note was a renewal of a former indebtedness which was secured by a chattel mortgage covering certain personal property belonging to the defendant. The plaintiff procured the issuance of a warrant of attachment and caused a levy to be made thereunder'. The affidavit for attachment set forth that “the defendant has sold, assigned, transferred, secreted and otherwise…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jasper v. HazenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Lloyd Mortgage Co. v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Gamble-Robinson Minot Co. v. MauratisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Grewer v. KinnischtzkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Peterson v. OglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API