Legal Opinion

Zippel v. Country Gardens, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1952PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Company, the appellant, contends that the quoted exclusion provision relieves it of liability to plaintiff.

Sec. 204.30 (3), Stats., provides as follows:

“No such policy shall be issued or delivered in this state to the owner of a motor vehicle, unless it contains a provision reading substantially as follows: The indemnity provided by this policy is extended to apply, in the same manner and under the same provisions as it is applicable to the named assured, to any person . . . operating any automobile described in this policy when such automobile is being used for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sandstrom v. Estate of ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Travelers Insurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
  4. Severin v. LuchinskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Ford v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API