Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

General Public Warehouse Co. v. Queen Line, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1959No. 407 of 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

The trial judge makes the following findings of fact:

1. At all times relevant to- this action, libellant General Public Warehouse, Inc., was a corporation existing under and by virtue of the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

2. At all times relevant to this action, respondents Queen Line, Ltd., Cadogan Steamship Company, Ltd., and Lomand Shipping Company, Ltd. (allegedly no longer in existence), were all of 50 Wellington Street, Glasgow, Scotland, and were the owners and operators of the *917S. S. Queen Maud (later sold to Nueva Valencia Compañía…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. The President MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. The ChickieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  4. United States v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  5. Cranberry Creek Coal Co. v. Red Star Towing & Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Osage Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Moran Transportation Corp. v. New York Trap Rock Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API