Coleman v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery, found the enhancement allegations to be true, and assessed his punishment at confinement for life.
In his first point of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds in violation of U.S. Const, amend. VI and XIV and Tex. Const, art. I, sec. 10.
The applicable standard to determine whether appellant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated is the balancing test articulated in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Escovedo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Ledesma v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- Mendes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- In the Matter of J.W.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.