Legal Opinion

State v. Malbeck

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1966No. 38653PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Poyhonen, J. †

Appellant was -charged by information with the crime of grand larceny by possession of property of a value in excess of $75 belonging to James R. Hughes, with knowledge that the property had been stolen. RCW 9.54.010(5). At the trial appellant did not testify or offer any defense. Following a jury verdict of guilty, he was sentenced to not more than 15 years. Appeal followed.

One of appellant’s three assignments of error is that the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress evidence based on the contention that a search warrant was unlawfully and improperly issued.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. State v. MasseyWashington Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. WalcottWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. State v. MannhaltCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API