State v. Gamez
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
*330Where the State’s witness testified concerning statements made to the victim by the victim’s brother and defendant failed to make a motion to strike that testimony, defendant did not preserve the issue for appellate review. For purposes of applying the recent amendment to Rule 702 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence in criminal proceedings, the operative date is the date that the indictment was filed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the expert opinion that the victim suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder when a licensed clinical social…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- Crocker v. RoethlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. StimsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. FinchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014