Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Bankers Association v. Federal Reserve Board, and Citicorp, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1985No. 83-2591PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
We review a Federal Reserve Board order approving the purchase of an inactive Oklahoma trust company charter by Citi-corp. Citicorp is a bank holding company under section 2(a) of the Bank Holding Company Act. 12 U.S.C. §§ 1841-1850. Its principal place of business is New…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. Investment Co. InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Independent Bankers Ass'n v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Harvey G. HerbermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Wilma F. Gundy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Bank of Commerce and First National Bank of Sheridan v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Wyoming BancorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rapp v. United States Department of Treasury, Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- In re RutenbergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Tom Rapp v. United States Department Of Treasury, Office Of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995