Warfield v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
BIRD, Judge.
Maurice Warfield was convicted on a charge of aiding and abetting his son, W. T. Warfield, in the murder of Harold Miller. His punishment was fixed at two years in the penitentiary. He appeals.
His grounds for reversal are threefold. First, he claims that the trial court erred in not sustaining his demurrer to the indictment. Second, he complains that the indictment was not read to the jury as required by law. Third, he claims that the trial court erred in not sustaining his motion for a directed verdict.
*914Arguments pertaining to the first and second grounds have been ably presented…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bradley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- McKinney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Roberts, Bevins and McCoy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Hurst v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arnett v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- McIntosh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
- McQueen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Commonwealth v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.