G. H. S. A. Ry. v. Daniels

1. Error was committed by the trial court in stating to the jury the issues involved, in omitting to state some of the defenses interposed by appellant. But this was an omission, and if appellant was not satisfied with it, a special charge should have been asked supplying the defect.

2. After submitting appellee's theory of the case, as alleged in her petition, the court instructed the jury as follows:

"If, however, you believe the defendant corporation did, and had done, all that could be required to render said bridge secure and safe for the passage of trains, and that the destruction of said…