Legal Opinion

Rowell v. Transpacific Life Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1979No. Civ. 54979PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendants leave to file a cross-complaint to name new parties to an action. The proposed cross-complaint asserts theories of proportionate equitable indemnity pursuant to American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court (1978) 20 Cal.3d 578 [146 CaI.Rptr. 182, 578 P.2d 899], While the case at bar potentially involves the novel issue of the effect of the still developing pleading rules of proportionate equitable indemnity upon the principle of California procedure that holds that generally an order denying leave to file a cross-complaint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Held v. ArantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Keenan v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Miller v. SteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Beecy v. PucciarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Pollack v. LytleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Platt v. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Holland v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Waldman v. LevineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API