Legal Opinion
James v. Tilghman
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 4, 1999No. 2:91 CV 1136 JGMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS
MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
The factual and procedural history behind this litigation is set forth in considerable detail in James v. Tilghman, 2:91 CV 1136(JGM), 1998 WL 849393 (D.Conn. Nov. 5, 1998) [“November 5th Ruling”]. Familiarity is presumed with the numerous pretrial rulings issued in this hotly litigated lawsuit, including: Ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Preclude Inmate Informant Identities and on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery of Inmate Identities and Document Withheld under Assertion of Privilege, filed March 29, 1999 (Dkt. #171)…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- James Williams v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, and W. Morgan, C.O., Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Martin H. Tankleff v. D.A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Rosario v. LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. PatakiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- Toliver v. New York City Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Henry v. DinelleDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Capuano v. Island Computer ProductsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006