Legal Opinion

Begay v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 7, 1987No. Nos. 268-85L, 335-85LPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

In these two consolidated cases, plaintiffs, members of the Navajo Tribe of Indians, seek to recover damages growing out of their relocation from their home sites in 1979, pursuant to the Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Act, Pub.L. No. 93-531, codified, as amended, at 25 U.S.C. § 640d et seq. (1982) (the Act or the Relocation Act). The damages plaintiffs seek are based on the social, cultural, economic and psychological harms they allegedly suffered as a result of their relocation. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss the consolidated complaints, or in the alternative a…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Jicarilla Apache NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Hopi Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Navajo Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Lucas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API