Legal Opinion

Kanealy v. Heiserman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1953No. 48269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWennerstrum, J.

By reason of an original writ of cer-tiorari directed to the respondent we are presented the question whether the district court exceeded its authority in its rulings in the particular proceeding which is here under consideration. The respondent has'filed a return wherein is incorporated preliminary proceedings in the estate of Anne W. Lenders, deceased. The particular question presented is whether the court exceeded its authority and jurisdiction in refusing to sustain objections to questions asked a witness pertaining to a joint bank account previously held by the heretofore referred to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. BieggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. In Re Estate of WinklerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Barto v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Findley v. JordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  5. Duro v. LaddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LendersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. In Re Estate of SamekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Samek v. SchultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API