Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Stroman v. Richardson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1922No. 22423Published

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action in the nature of quo warranto to oust from office respondents Arthur J. Richardson, William Myers, William Lytle, Myron Osborn, Samuel Severn, and James Keefe, who, it is charged, are unlawfully exercising the powers of the board of education of consolidated school district No. 3 of York county. A further purpose of the action is the dissolution of the consolidated school district ■described, on the ground that it has no legal existence. One of the relators is Charles F. Stroman, county attorney of York county. Another is William J. Hoffmaster, a resident taxpayer, who sues…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State ex rel. Tanner v. WarrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Gaddis v. School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Dappen v. WeberNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Malin v. HouselNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API