Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Steere, J. Replevin by Ered Cooper against William S. Smith. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant in justice’s court in replevin for an omnibus and one set of hub runners, valued at $40, his declaration being in the usual form. Defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that he had bought the property for $40, and that he was the owner of it; that in January, 1895, the plaintiff had sued him in assumpsit for the purchase price of the omnibus, in which -suit a bill of particulars was filed, claiming pay for the omnibus, $40; that issue was joined in that case January 19, 1895, and thé cause adjourned until February 6, 1895, at which time plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. WattMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donovan v. CurtsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Noto v. Acme Truck Sales & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Roseboom v. CorbittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  4. Weiss v. SteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API