Canadian Insurance v. Ehrlich
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, J.
The Canadian Insurance Company of California (hereinafter, Canadian) brought an action for declaratory relief to determine whether Canadian’s automobile liability insurance policy covered John Bohm’s (John) use of Robert Bohm’s (Robert) car. Canadian successfully moved for summary judgment, establishing no such coverage. The persons injured by John’s use of the car and the survivors of a person killed by that use (collectively, the defendants) appeal. We affirm.
Factual Background
A. The Accident
In July of 1985, Robert owned an uninsured truck. Since Robert’s driver’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FlyntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. SwearingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Kincer v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Malinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Mercury Insurance Group v. Checkerboard PizzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Daun v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Gilmer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Daun v. USAA Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.