Longhini v. Bishop
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Father appeals from a juvenile court order that is entitled “Order Upon Completion of Preliminary Inquiry.” See former ORS 419.482(2). Although father contends that that order “dismissed” his earlier-filed dependency petition, it did not. On the date that the juvenile court entered the present order, father’s petition was on appeal; that appeal was subsequently dismissed and the trial court has not yet ruled on the petition. The interlocutory order before us is not appealable. See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Hurley, 65 Or App 805, 672 P2d 72 (1983); State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. East, 38 Or App…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. NagleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. EastCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State ex rel Juvenile Department v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Longhini v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995