State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. East
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
The state, acting on behalf of the child, appeals an order of the juvenile court which denies termination of mother’s parental rights.1 We must first determine if the order in question is appealable. City of Hermiston v. ERB, 280 Or 291, 570 P2d 663 (1977).2 We conclude that it is. On the merits, we conclude that the mother’s parental rights should be terminated and reverse.
I. APPEALABILITY
Appeals under the Oregon Juvenile Code, ORS ch 419, are authorized by ORS 419.561(1) which provides, in pertinent part,
"Any person whose rights or duties are adversely affected by a final order of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. McMasterOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Hermiston v. Employment Relations BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. OF MULTNOMAH v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- F. v. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. VockrodtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. DarnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. HermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. MigliorettoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.