Legal Opinion
Noell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1950No. 11989_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, District Judge.
The appellants, husband and wife, were convicted after a lengthy jury trial of knowingly and fraudulently concealing assets in bankruptcy and making false oaths in connection therewith. They were tried under a three-count indictment charging violations of 11 U.S.C.A. § 52, sub. b(l, 2). Such sections of the Code have since been replaced by new Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 152, Crimes and Criminal Procedure. Their motion for new trial was denied and judgment and sentences were entered upon the verdicts of the jury.
In the first count defendants were charged jointly with knowingly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Todorow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Arine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Hersh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- In Re Luma Camera Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alexander Bisno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- E. C. Lloyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- John A. Metheany v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Howard P. Carroll and H. Carroll & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Clinton E. Jencks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.