Legal Opinion

Bolmar v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1927No. 26,955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by the owner of land lying outside a city to enjoin vacation of a street in the city. Injunction was granted, and the city appeals.

This is the third appearance in this court of litigation over a road which the district court has twice found is of little practical use as a road. (Bolmar v. Shawnee County, 109 Kan. 91, 197 Pac. 880; Bolmar v. Shawnee County, 114 Kan. 552, 220 Pac. 245.) To save making a synopsis, the reader is referred to the opinion in the second case, which contains a map of thé road and the property…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. City of Belleville v. HallowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Bolmar v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruff v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Gorrill v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Kinney v. Reno Community High SchoolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API