Bolmar v. City of Topeka
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The action was one by the owner of land lying outside a city to enjoin vacation of a street in the city. Injunction was granted, and the city appeals.
This is the third appearance in this court of litigation over a road which the district court has twice found is of little practical use as a road. (Bolmar v. Shawnee County, 109 Kan. 91, 197 Pac. 880; Bolmar v. Shawnee County, 114 Kan. 552, 220 Pac. 245.) To save making a synopsis, the reader is referred to the opinion in the second case, which contains a map of thé road and the property…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- City of Belleville v. HallowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Board of County Commissioners v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Bolmar v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ruff v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Gorrill v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Kinney v. Reno Community High SchoolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930