Legal Opinion

Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 13, 1942No. 95PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

The question for decision is whether a statute of Puerto Rico impairs the obligation of certain contracts in violation of the Island’s organic law.1

The respondent’s predecessor in title, Fortuna Estates, as owner or lessee of lands adjacent to the Jacaguas River, enjoyed under Spanish law, and respondent, as successor, still enjoys, rights appurtenant to the lands to draw from the river 12,612.1 acre-feet of water per year for irrigation.

Puerto Rico adopted a law in 19082 which authorized an irrigation system, as part of which a dam was to be erected in Jacaguas River above Fortuna’s intakes.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. People of Porto Rico v. HavemeyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
  3. Porto Rico v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920
  4. Russell & Co. v. People of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  5. Gallardo v. La Plata Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Centex Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. KeeganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Cordero v. Prensa Insular De Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  4. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. AlaskaTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API