Legal Opinion

Raskopf v. Raskopf

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

The parties to this matrimonial action seek a pretrial ruling on how to determine, for purposes of equitable distribution, the value of the plaintiffs interest in the law firm in which he was a partner at the time the action was commenced.

*1018The difficulty here is that the firm, Townley & Updike, was dissolved subsequent to the start of this action, and Mr. Raskopf thereafter, in February 1995, became a member of White & Case.

In the course of discovery a court-appointed expert valued plaintiffs interest in Townley & Updike, as of September 30, 1994, at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Wegman v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Harmon v. HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Greenwald v. GreenwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Finocchio v. FinocchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rochelle G. v. Harold M. G.New York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API