Raskopf v. Raskopf
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David B. Saxe, J.
The parties to this matrimonial action seek a pretrial ruling on how to determine, for purposes of equitable distribution, the value of the plaintiffs interest in the law firm in which he was a partner at the time the action was commenced.
*1018The difficulty here is that the firm, Townley & Updike, was dissolved subsequent to the start of this action, and Mr. Raskopf thereafter, in February 1995, became a member of White & Case.
In the course of discovery a court-appointed expert valued plaintiffs interest in Townley & Updike, as of September 30, 1994, at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Wegman v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Harmon v. HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Greenwald v. GreenwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Finocchio v. FinocchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rochelle G. v. Harold M. G.New York Supreme Court · 1996