Rochelle G. v. Harold M. G.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lewis R. Friedman, J.

This is the court’s decision, findings of fact and conclusions of law after the trial of this divorce action. On December 7, 1995, the Court of Appeals decided McSparron v McSparron (87 NY2d 275); this case was reopened for additional proof on the value of defendant’s (Husband’s) license to practice law. The parties each retained experts other than those who had testi*810tied at the trial and testimony was taken on the McSparron issue.

The parties were married on December 26, 1971. At the time of the marriage both parties were 22 years old. There are two…