Legal Opinion
People v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 2003No. H025229PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
This original proceeding arises from a prosecution for possession of methamphetamine. It is a People’s petition seeking a writ of mandate directing respondent court to vacate its order rejecting a Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 peremptory challenge.1 The question is whether the reasoning of People v. Superior Court (Jimenez) (2002) 28 Cal.4th 798 [123 Cal.Rptr.2d 31, 50 P.3d 743] (Jimenez), construing Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (p) (relitigated motions to suppress must be heard by the same judge),2 to be an implied exception to section 170.6, compels that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Eagle Maintenance & Supply Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Standard Microsystems Corp. v. Winbond Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Turner, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Brewer v. Superior Court of Contra Costa Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.