Legal Opinion
Kilmer v. Leavitt
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 26, 2009No. 2:07-cv-01094PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
This case is an appeal from the denial of Medicare part D benefits. For the reasons that follow, the Court affirms.
I. Background
Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq., provides for the Medicare program, which is a health insurance program for qualifying individuals that is funded and administered by the federal government. The Secretary of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary”) administers the Medicare program, one component of which is a voluntary prescription drug benefits program constituting Medicare Part D.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- United States ex rel. Brown v. Celgene Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- United States ex rel. Dickson v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- LAYZER v. LeavittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Brew v. BurwellDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.