Wiley v. Coovert
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Grant Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellee brought this suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, and the appellant was made a party to the suit to answer as to his interest in the property. The notice was directed against Maggert, and a decree was entered foreclosing the lien. The appellant, Wiley, alone appeals, for Maggert does not join in the appeal.
*560Filed April 4, 1891.
It is suggested, rather than asserted by appellant’s counsel, that as there is no evidence that Maggert was the owner this suit must fail. We think that the appellant can not successfully make that point. The appellant has a right to avail himself of all…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Fox v. GalvinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Umbstead v. Preachers' Aid Society of the Northwest Indiana Conference of the Methodist Episcopal ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
- State Board of Tax Commissioners v. StanleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- Acme Bedford Stone Co. v. McPhetridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.