Legal Opinion
Engelson v. Commerce Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.
The plaintiff, while a passenger upon an omnibus operated for the carriage of passengers for hire upon the public highways, received injuries. Claiming that her damage was caused by the negligence of the owner and operator of the omnibus she brought an action against that company. The result of the action was a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, upon which execution *887had been issued and returned unsatisfied and that judgment remains wholly unpaid. Plaintiff then brought this action to recover on a policy of insurance issued by the defendant covering the omnibus in question. This policy was in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Devlin v. New York Mutual Casualty Taxicab InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Vance v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Devlin v. New York Mutual Casualty Taxicab InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1924
- Sandolovich v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Roche v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Illinois Casualty Co. v. KrolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
- Thompson v. Amalgamated Cas. Ins. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Baron v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.