Legal Opinion

Empire State Railroad v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided October 15, 1920No. Claim No. 2495-APublishedCited by 1 opinion

Claim for damages for flooding lands.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

This claim is for damages against the state alleged to have been caused to the property of the claimant by the flooding thereof, resulting from the action of the state in raising the height of the Phoenix Dam in the Oswego river, and keeping the gates therein closed or partly closed in March and April, 1914. Such is the allegation in the claim. The notice of intention, however, contained the further allegation: “And said damages were caused, wholly or in part, by the interference by the State, by its works and structures, with the flow of water in said Oswego and Seneca rivers above said…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. . BondNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Deyo v. . MorssNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Konner v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Konner v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Deyo v. MorssNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murray v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API