Legal Opinion

Rush v. Townsend and Wall Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 9, 1961No. 47991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

This is a suit for damages for personal injuries sustained by Pearl Rush when she fell on the stairs in the Sixth Street vestibule of the Townsend and Wall department store in St. Joseph. A trial jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $12,500. On December 7, 1959 defendant filed a notice of appeal from the ensuing judgment.

Plaintiff fell as she started to descend these stairs :

Plaintiff’s theory of recovery ‘ was that -defendant failed to exercise ordinary care ;to keep the landing and stairway in a reasonably safe condition for the use of fits customers and business…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. Allied Stores of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Lyons v. LichOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Stoll v. First National Bank of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Wattels v. MarreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Lindquist v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. WilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. Wilburn v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Vreeland v. STATE, BOARD OF REGENTSCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Pizzurro v. First North County Bank & Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Fennell v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API