Legal Opinion
Ethyl Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, American Automobile Manufacturers Association, Ferroalloys Association, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 14, 1995No. 94-1505PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:
At issue in this case is a claim that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA” or “Agency”) has imper-missibly construed a provision of the Clean Air Act (“Act”) governing the regulation of fuel additives. Title II of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7521-7590 (1988 & Supp. V 1993), establishes a comprehensive scheme for regulating motor vehicle emission and fuel standards for the prevention and control of air pollution. 1 Section 211(f)(1) prohibits the introduction into commerce of new fuels or fuel…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- City of Olmsted Falls, Ohio v. Federal Aviation Administration and Department of Transportation, City of Cleveland, Ohio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- New York v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Texas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.