Legal Opinion

Kernagan v. City of Ft. Worth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1917No. 8275PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The city of Ft. Worth, on June 11, 1913, for the benefit of Roach Manigan, a partnership, filed this suit against D. H. Kernagan, and for cause of action alleged that the board of commissioners of said city, acting under the provisions of its charter, had resolved that certain named streets in said city should be paved, and that a certain part of the cost of such paving should be adjudged against the abutting property owners; that thereafter specifications for said work were prepared by the engineer of said city and submitted to the board of commissioners, and by said commissioners were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Hutcheson v. StorrieTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Parker v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. East Texas Fire Ins.v. CoffeeTexas Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Ft. Worth v. Capps Land Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Amsler v. D. S. Cage & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Wichita Falls, R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co. v. EmberlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. City of Lubbock v. Geo. L. Simpson & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Wichita Falls, R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co. v. EmberlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API