Legal Opinion

Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 21, 1957No. 599PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Probable jurisdiction is noted. In view of the refusal of the appellant to approve rental schedules for furnished apartments in appellee’s apartment project unless appellee agrees not to rent apartments for periods of less than 30 days, a cause of action for injunctive relief is stated. An injunction restraining enforcement of an Act of Congress for repugnance to the Constitution cannot, however, be granted by any District Court unless the application is heard and determined by a three-judge District Court, 28 U. S. C. § 2282. The judgment is *978therefore reversed and the case is remanded for…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Norton Ex Rel. Chiles v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. City of Meridian v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Juan Rigores Sardino v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. Williams v. ZbarazSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API