Legal Opinion

State v. Maldonado

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 12, 2009No. 1 CA-CR 07-0837PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge.

¶ 1 Frank R. Maldonado (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction and sentence for Possession of Narcotic Drugs with Two or More Prior Felony Convictions, a class four felony, pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) § 13-3408. Defendant contends that because the only information in the court’s file was dated and filed after he was convicted and sentenced, the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and he is entitled to reversal. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the court had subject matter jurisdiction and affirm.

FACTS 1 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 On…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Woolley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  5. State v. NihiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. State v. MaldonadoArizona Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API