Legal Opinion
Flowers v. McDonough
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 3, 2006No. 1D05-5270PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
932 So.2d 617 (2006)
Gary Levester FLOWERS, Petitioner,
v.
James R. McDONOUGH, Respondent.
No. 1D05-5270.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 3, 2006.
Gary L. Flowers, pro se, Petitioner.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Linda Horton Dodson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
The petitioner's argument that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by denying his petition for writ of mandamus is without merit and is rejected. But because the underlying action constitutes a "collateral criminal proceeding" pursuant to section…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- McDonough v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Cox v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Pruitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
4Cited by2 opinions
- Terry v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Pruitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006